So it鈥檚 perhaps piling on at this point to note that, a century ago, the profoundly antisemitic beliefs of Harvard鈥檚 leaders built the cradle that nurtured the much-reviled college admissions essay. Eliminating it now in 2024 would be a concrete and dramatic repudiation of Harvard鈥檚 troubled past 鈥� and makes even more sense in the wake of last summer鈥檚 Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action. Which Harvard also lost.

But first, some history. In the summer of 1922, President Lawrence Lowell told Langdon Marvin, a Harvard Overseer, that 鈥渁part from the Jews.鈥� the university鈥檚 admissions method was working well. As Jerome Karabel explained in The Chosen, the problem wasn鈥檛 the process but the outcome: Too many of the wrong type of men were getting in. By 1925, when 28% of the class was Jewish, Harvard鈥檚 leaders feared the environment was so poisoned that Anglo-Saxon Protestants would no longer enroll their sons.

Marvin suggested adopting a 鈥渃haracter standard,鈥� like the Rhodes scholarship used, to halt 鈥�.鈥�  So in 1926, Harvard added a personal essay that could be scrutinized to assess the applicant鈥檚 fit. 

Given Harvard鈥檚 prominence and influence, the essay soon became a fixed feature of the application at other Ivies, and eventually, universally. The Jewish population quickly fell to a more manageable 15% where it stayed until the 1950s.

Around 1975 Harvard decided that Asian kids with great grades and elite test scores were the new problem. Thankfully, application readers 鈥� like at many other elite universities 鈥� could scrutinize prospective students鈥� essays for additional evidence. When the plaintiffs in the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard case reviewed 160,000 student files they discovered 鈥� who鈥檇 have guessed it? 鈥� that on traits like 鈥減ositive personality,鈥� likability, courage, kindness and being 鈥渨idely respected,鈥� the University鈥檚 application readers gave Asian student of any ethnic group.

In last summer鈥檚 affirmative action decision, the court ruled unconstitutional the use of racial preferences in college admissions, putting the personal statement back in the news. In its decision, the court pointed admissions officers to a narrow path they could walk in finding evidence of an applicants鈥� merit from her essay. But the court鈥檚 discussion only served to underline, a century later, the essay鈥檚 subjective and fundamentally discriminatory purpose.

As any parent of a high school senior can tell you, the admissions essay is a nightmare. With the rare exception of the University of Chicago, which puts its prompts to a student vote, the topics are solipsistic and encourage applicants to stretch their experiences to the limits of credibility. Since everyone knows they鈥檙e being scrutinized unfairly, writing the personal statement becomes a metacognitive exercise in guessing what College X wants, while being told to 鈥渂e yourself.鈥� Brilliant advice for stressed out 17-year-olds emerging from puberty and trying to define themselves, by acting just like their peers.

For some the process involves hiring 鈥渃ounselors鈥� who 鈥渁dvise鈥� the student on how best to tell their story. High schools devote class time to helping students prepare their essays. Time that might be spent discussing actual literature, which suggest just six percent of high school graduates can do really well.

Less advantaged children tell of the or oppression to catch the eye of the application reader. Perceval Everett鈥檚 2001 dark satire Erasure 鈥� which just netted an Oscar for best adaptation 鈥� cleverly captures the zeitgeist.

Evidence that the three data points most predictive of a student鈥檚 success in college are their high school GPA, the challenge of their course load, and their standardized test scores. In a misguided effort to increase diversity, many colleges stopped requiring test scores, but seeing the results, are now reversing course.

To the extent that colleges believe a student鈥檚 grades in English or history do not confirm his or her writing ability, they could require a graded essay from one of their junior year classes. It would be far more insightful 鈥� and less subjective than the recommendations that are the bane of many teachers鈥� existence. (And yes, Harvard also invented the recommendation letter as another way to ensure their students were 鈥渢he right sort.鈥�)

As we approach the 100^th anniversary of Harvard鈥檚 spawning of a racist tool to discriminate, while not appearing to do so, it would be a real sign of contrition were the leadership in Cambridge to announce they are jettisoning this shameful legacy. Apart from atoning for their own original sin, this would make it safe for other schools to follow Harvard鈥檚 example. As Harvard Law grad Joseph Welch once said, 鈥淵ou’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?鈥�

founded the International Charter School in Brooklyn and writes frequently on education.

Amid reports of heightened antisemitism and Islamophobia in schools and colleges since the start of the Israel-Hamas war, a senior Education Department official said the agency has received a 鈥渉uge, huge influx鈥� of civil rights complaints that have led to a surge in federal investigations. 

Since the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas terrorists on Israel and the subsequent bombing and invasion of Gaza by the Israeli military, the into schools鈥� and colleges鈥� responses to complaints of discrimination based on shared ancestry, which includes antisemitism and Islamophobia. 

Of the new investigations, the senior official told 社区黑料, 19 are in response to conduct that unfolded in schools in the last two months alone. Of the incidents since Oct. 7 that are now under investigation, 17 took place on college campuses. 

Last fiscal year, by contrast, the office opened 28 shared ancestry investigations over the entire 12-month period. The year before, there were just 15. Such inquiries seek to determine whether schools adequately respond to incidents that create hostile learning environments in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, ethnicity or national origin. 

鈥淲e are deeply concerned about the incidents that we’ve seen reported in schools all over the country, and about the safety of students, and the protection of non-discrimination rights for students in P-12 schools as well as in institutions of higher education,鈥� Catherine Lhamon, the department鈥檚 assistant secretary for civil rights, said in an interview Wednesday with 社区黑料. 鈥淲e’re very, very concerned about what we’re seeing in schools.鈥�

Though officials declined to comment on the specifics of active federal investigations, a spike in reported antisemitic and Islamophobic incidents in and outside of schools have convulsed the nation and elevated student safety concerns. 

Near Louisiana鈥檚 Tulane University, a clash between pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel and police are investigating a as a potential hate crime targeting an Arab Muslim student. At Rutgers University, officials chapter following claims the group disrupted classes and vandalized campus. At Harvard University, a rabbi to hide the campus menorah each night of Hanukkah due to vandalism fears. In California, a with involuntary manslaughter and battery after an alleged physical altercation broke out at a demonstration that led to the death of a Jewish protester. 

Outside of schools, police said a 6-year-old Chicago boy was in an alleged anti-Muslim attack, and in Burlington, Vermont, three college while walking down a sidewalk over Thanksgiving weekend. 

The escalating confrontations have embroiled school leaders, who have been criticized for failing to clamp down on hate speech and discrimination. Just days after in Washington about rising antisemitism on college campuses, Elizabeth Magill resigned as University of Pennsylvania president. She and the presidents of Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology were accused of being equivocating and evasive after giving carefully worded replies to repeated questions about whether calling for the “genocide of Jews” violated their schools’ code of conduct. Magill responded that it鈥檚 鈥渁 context-dependent decision,鈥� underscoring school leaders鈥� obligations to ensure safe learning environments while protecting people鈥檚 free speech rights. 

Harvard University President Tuesday after facing similar scrutiny for her testimony at the congressional hearing and unrelated plagiarism allegations.

Of the 29 active federal Title VI investigations opened since Oct. 7, just eight are focused on incidents in K-12 schools 鈥� including at three of the nation鈥檚 10 largest districts. Among them are the New York City Department of Education, the Clark County School District in Las Vegas, Hillsborough County Schools in Tampa, Florida, and the Cobb County School District in suburban Atlanta.

Though the circumstances prompting the investigations remain unknown, many of the institutions included on the Education Department鈥檚 list of active investigations have experienced high-profile incidents involving discrimination. 

In New York City, a raucous, and prompted a lockdown after a teacher posted a picture of herself at a pro-Israel rally on social media. Also turning to social media, one student said the teacher 鈥渋s going to be executed in the town square,鈥� and another promoted 鈥渁 riot鈥� against her. 

In suburban Atlanta, the Cobb County School District sparked controversy following the Hamas attack to the school community that warned of an 鈥渋nternational threat,鈥� noting that 鈥渨hile there is no reason to believe this threat has anything to do with our schools, parents can expect both law enforcement and school staff to take every step to keep your children safe.鈥� Because of the message, several Muslim parents said their children had become the targets of Islamophobic bullying. 

In , the civil rights office highlighted hypothetical instances that put school districts at odds with their Title VI obligations. Among them: A Jewish student is targeted by his peers with swastikas and Nazi salutes but his teacher tells him to 鈥渏ust ignore it鈥� without taking steps to address the harassment. Another example involves school officials failing to remedy a Muslim student鈥檚 complaints that she was called a 鈥渢errorist鈥� and told 鈥測ou started 9/11.鈥�

Even before the most recent conflict between Hamas and Israel, law enforcement agencies across the U.S. have reported an uptick in hate crimes over the last several years, including on campuses. 

Reported hate crimes surged 7% between 2021 and 2022, released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in October, including a 36% increase in anti-Jewish incidents 鈥� which accounted for more than half of incidents based on religion. Among all reported hate crimes, 10% occurred at K-12 schools and colleges.

The Education Department last month released its most recent Civil Rights Data Collection, the first since the pandemic. Students reported 42,500 harassment allegations during the 2020-21 school year, including bullying on the basis of sex, race, sexual orientation, disability and religion. Of those, 29% involved harassment or bullying on the basis of race while only a sliver 鈥� 3% 鈥� involved students saying they were targeted because of their religion. 

The current climate has put Jewish college students on edge, according to , a nonprofit focused on eradicating antisemitism. Since the beginning of the academic year, 73% of Jewish college students said they鈥檝e been witness to antisemitism. Prior to this school year, 70% reported experiencing antisemitism throughout their entire college experience. Yet just 30% of Jewish college students said their college administration has taken sufficient steps to address anti-Jewish prejudice. 

During a televised interview on MSNBC Friday, Jonathan Greenblatt, the national director and CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, said he thought conditions would improve on college campuses for Jewish students because the Title VI investigations now being launched by the Education Department would force college administrators to take action. 

Muslim Americans of all ages have similarly . In a two-week period between Oct. 7 and Oct. 24, reports of bias incidents and requests for help at the Council on American-Islamic Relations surged 182% from the average 16-day period in 2022. 

As lawmakers call on school leaders to take a stronger stance against hate speech, they鈥檝e faced pushback from free speech advocates. Earlier this month, New York of 鈥渁ggressive enforcement action鈥� if they failed to discipline students 鈥渃alling for the genocide of any group of people.鈥� In a statement, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, a right-leaning nonprofit focused on students鈥� free speech rights, said Hochul鈥檚 admonition 鈥渃annot be squared with the First Amendment.鈥�  

鈥淐olleges and universities can and should punish 鈥榗alls for genocide鈥� when such speech falls into one of the narrowly defined categories of unprotected speech, including true threats, incitement and discriminatory harassment,鈥� the group said in the statement. 鈥淏ut broad, vague bans on 鈥榗alls for genocide,鈥� absent more, would result in the censorship of protected expression.鈥�

The senior Education Department official said that schools must 鈥渘avigate carefully鈥� their obligations under Title VI and the First Amendment. Even if a student鈥檚 speech is protected, the official said, school leaders still have an obligation to uphold all students鈥� nondiscrimination rights.

鈥淲hat concerns me is when a school community throws up its hands and says, 鈥楾his speech is protected and so there鈥檚 nothing more for us here,鈥欌�� said Lhamon, the assistant secretary for civil rights. 鈥淭hat may be true, but that鈥檚 only true where a hostile environment isn鈥檛 created that the school needs to respond to.鈥�