Screen time limits for Los Angeles Unified School District鈥檚 youngest students begin in August.

鈥淢y hope and expectation is that most families will see a dramatic reduction in screen time during the school day, but also in the evenings, as mandated by school,鈥� said Nick Melvoin, who represents the Westside鈥檚 Board District 4.

While LAUSD was the , the policy, along with , is part of a nationwide trend toward limiting young people鈥檚 exposure to tech during the school day.

Many parents have embraced 鈥� and advocated for鈥� less technology in the classroom, but questions remain about how LAUSD will enforce the screen time limits and the potential for unintended consequences for students who have less access to devices outside of school.

What part of the screen time limits start in August?

The  eliminates digital device usage for students in early education (preschool), transitional kindergarten (TK), kindergarten and first grade.

There are several exceptions, including:

Students will not be automatically issued devices to take home. However, there is still a process for families to request one.

The policy also requires the district to block all students from accessing YouTube, social media and streaming platforms without teacher approval.

The type of work students bring home may change, too. The policy encourages educators to provide off-screen assignments.

鈥淗omework should prioritize reading, writing, problem-solving, hands-on activities, observation, and other learning experiences that can be completed without the use of a device,鈥� .

Andr茅s Chait, the district鈥檚 superintendent, said at a July 21 news conference that implementing the new policy will take time.

鈥淥n Aug. 12, you may not necessarily see in the immediate all of the changes that the policy calls for, but they will be implemented methodically and transparently,鈥� Chait said.

Where did the screen time policy come from?

A group of Los Angeles parents organized a group called  in 2025 and started , collecting petition signatures and .

Melvoin brought forward the resolution that ultimately led to the new policy .

鈥淲e had not recalibrated or reset our relationship with technology post-COVID,鈥� said Melvoin, at the time. 鈥淪ix years ago, we sent every kid in L.A. home with a device, which was a lifeline. 鈥� But when they came back, I’m still seeing kids as young as preschool on devices all day.鈥�

The board adopted the policy  after staff conducted research and outreach to parents, educators and community members.

How much does it cost to limit screen time?

District staff  up to $4 million in one-time funds to purchase carts to store laptops in elementary school classrooms and an annual $1 million to pay for software to track screen time and block content.

The district has yet to spend this money, according to a statement from a Los Angeles Unified spokesperson.

鈥淐onversations with schools will take place in the early part of the upcoming school year to assess needs on a school-by-school basis,鈥� the statement read.

Was there any pushback to the new policy?

The board voted unanimously to adopt the screen time policy with the exception of Board President Scott Schmerelson, who recused himself from the vote.

However, there was some discussion about whether the limitations would have unintended consequences for teachers and students.

Board Vice President Roc铆o Rivas cautioned that the minute limits may discourage teachers from assigning multimedia projects, and adds the burden of monitoring student technology use.

鈥淪chools may end up focusing on counting minutes, documenting usage, auditing classrooms instead of evaluating learning outcomes,鈥� Rivas said.

LAUSD staff鈥檚  noted a 鈥渞isk of slowing access to technology and its advancement for students to compete with the world.鈥�

During public comment in June, Mireya Garcia, a mother and grandmother, told the board that her family shares a single computer at home.

鈥淚 don鈥檛 want them to lose access to tools that can help them read, to learn and to be successful,鈥� Garcia said.

How are teachers preparing for the changes?

LAUSD adopted the screen time policy when most teachers and students were off-campus for the summer.

A Los Angeles Unified spokesperson wrote in a statement that training has started with 鈥渄edicated sessions鈥� for principals and administrators and that more resources will be available to educators before Aug.12 and throughout the school year.

鈥淭his approach allows us to be respectful of educators鈥� time while ensuring schools are prepared and supported for a successful rollout,鈥� the spokesperson wrote.

The first opportunity for most teachers to return to their classroom is on Monday, Aug. 10, two days before school starts.

Stephanie Levinson, who鈥檚 taught at San Fernando Elementary for 28 years, said she has not received any additional guidance from the district since the policy was passed this summer.

This year, she鈥檒l teach a combined first- and second-grade class. Under the new policy, first graders do not have access to digital devices and second graders can use them for up to 20 minutes per day this year.

鈥淚t’s stressful because we don’t know,鈥� Levinson said. 鈥淚t’s hard to plan a school day when we’re not sure what’s gonna be mandated, how things are gonna work.鈥�

Levinson said that, in the past, she鈥檇 assign students to use interactive learning programs like ABCmouse while she worked with their peers in small groups. She also fundraised to bring laptops and tablets to her classroom, where most students come from low-income families, before the devices were widespread in the district.

鈥淚f a kid hasn’t learned how to even use a computer or type, how are they going to鈥ot be disadvantaged against kids that have computers?鈥� Levinson said.

How can families get access to a digital device?

Parents and guardians can request a take-home device  or through the district鈥檚 .

The Los Angeles Public Library has a for adults.

What鈥檚 next for screen time in LAUSD?

The policy requires the board to review the screen time rules at least once a year during a public meeting.

鈥淥ne of the reasons we crafted this policy is because we didn’t see a policy that we could just adopt nationally,鈥� Melvoin said. 鈥淏ut that also means that it’ll be iterative and that we’re working out the kinks.鈥�

The district has also created an ad hoc committee to provide recommendations on how the district is using AI.

• District- and state-mandated assessments.聽
• Students enrolled in the LAUSD Virtual Academy program.聽
• To help students with disabilities learn, as mandated by their Individualized Education Program (IEP) or 504 Plan.聽

This was originally published by .

Indiana鈥檚 Senate Education Committee on Wednesday advanced two bills aimed at reshaping how young Hoosiers interact with technology 鈥� one that would restrict minors鈥� access to social media platforms and another that would require schools to strengthen technology plans and give parents greater control over at-home device use.

, authored by committee chair Sen. Jeff Raatz, R-Richmond, passed the panel 11-2 and was recommitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where it must be approved before moving to the full chamber.

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 社区黑料 Newsletter

Democrats Sen. Andrea Hunley, D-Indianapolis, and Sen. Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington, were the only 鈥渘o鈥� votes against the social media.

The measure contains multiple provisions, but a highly-discussed section would substantially restrict minors鈥� access to social media. Under the proposal, social media companies like Meta would be required to obtain written parental permission before a minor under age 18 could create an account.

social media restriction language but ultimately stalled in the House.

Supporters argued in committee that the bill is a response to growing concerns over social media鈥檚 impact on children鈥檚 mental health and school environments.

Indiana Secretary of Education Katie Jenner emphasized the toll she said social media is taking on students across Hoosier schools.

鈥淔or most of us in the room, social media arrived when we were already well into adulthood,鈥� Jenner said, adding that 鈥渙ur children growing up today do not have that same luxury鈥� of a childhood free from constant comparison, cyberbullying, algorithm-driven content and addictive features.

But critics raised concerns about enforcement, privacy and rights of students.

Samantha Bresnahan with the American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, for example, argued that such restrictions could infringe on minors鈥� constitutional rights and require intrusive data collection to verify age and consent.

Parents get more say

, authored by Sen. Spencer Deery, R-West Lafayette, takes a different tack on technology.

The measure, which passed the education committee 12-1, would require Indiana鈥檚 traditional public and charter schools to include in their technology plans a description of how they will enable parents to exercise control over school-provided devices when they are not in school and strengthen internet use and wireless communication policies.

If approved, schools must adopt policies by Jan. 1, 2027, that would let parents increase the strength of content filters on school-issued devices and limit the time students can use those devices outside school hours. The bill also directs schools to prohibit use of school equipment 鈥渇or noneducational purposes during instructional time.鈥�

Hunley was the lone vote against the proposal.

鈥淚 think that our school boards can already do this if they would like to,鈥� she said. 鈥淚鈥檓 a big fan of home rule and local control, and I think that the level of government that鈥檚 closest to the school building should be the one to make this decision and enact this policy, not the state.鈥�

Sen. Stacey Donato, R-Logansport, voted in favor but urged additional consideration of how parental controls might apply during e-learning days.

鈥淲e talked about the parental controls on an e-learning day, that (parents) may not want a YouTube video or a TikTok or pick-your-poison that may be used in structure for the educational experience,鈥� she told Deery. 鈥淚 just encourage you to look into that.鈥�

Democrats also pressed for clarity on potential costs to schools.

Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, asked whether districts might need to spend money to implement stronger parental controls.

Deery said his office could not identify any examples where Hoosier schools would take on additional costs because most already contract with vendors that offer such functionality. 鈥�

We鈥檝e yet to find any institution that does not have a contract with a vendor that does not offer this,鈥� he said. 鈥淚鈥檝e confirmed with virtually all of the major vendors. So, I鈥檓 not aware of (any costs schools would incur).鈥�

is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Indiana Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Niki Kelly for questions: info@indianacapitalchronicle.com.